Blog


What Does Recall Really Mean? The GHTF Aim to Provide Clarity

The recent PIP breast implant saga is a reminder of just how important it is for us, the medical device industry, to have a universal system for identifying, classifying and resolving product recall situations.  Despite its importance, the term recall is currently not harmonised. The term has different meanings depending on region which can result in confusion for regulatory authorities and users worldwide. The Global Harmonisation Task Force (GHTF) has released a draft guidance document which may just pave the way for harmonised terminology, clarifying things for all medical device manufacturers....

Continue Reading


Export Corporation Penalised $3.1 Million for Illegal Supply

On the 3rd of February 2012 the Federal Court ruled that Export Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd should pay civil penalties of just over $3.1 million for importing and supplying a number of products that were not on the Australian Register for Therapeutic Goods (ARTG). This comes as stern reminder for all therapeutic goods manufacturers and suppliers that regulatory requirements should be a key component of business practice in Australia. The decision shows that the Federal Court can and will impose significant penalties on therapeutic goods manufacturers and suppliers who import or supply......

Continue Reading


Changes Afoot for Medical Device Manufacturers in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Cuba

The agencies which regulate medical devices in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Cuba have initiated plans to work together to recognise certification of medical device manufacturers. The regulatory bodies ANMAT (Argentina), ANVISA (Brazil), INVIMA (Colombia) and CECMED (Cuba) have recently signed an agreement as a result of an initiative which was passed during the Pan-American Health Organisation (PAHO/OPS) September/October 2010 summit. The details of the mutual agreement are to be defined during 2012 and it is hoped that the agreement will be operative from 2013. The four regulatory bodies will work independently to......

Continue Reading


The Australian Government Release a Blueprint for TGA’s Future – How Does This Affect Your Organisation?

The Australian government released the Blueprint for TGA’s future in early December 2011 which describes the results of 18 months of discussion and review of proposed reforms. The reforms are designed to improve the transparency and efficiency of therapeutic goods regulation and will affect almost all manufacturers and sponsors of therapeutic goods in Australia. The government’s blueprint includes the following: Plans to focus on improving communication and engagement with the community with the intention of becoming a well known and understood regulatory agency. Plans to establish an Australian Therapeutic Goods Advisory Council......

Continue Reading


IEC 60601-1, 3rd Edition

IEC 60601-1 third edition has become a common subject of discussion for medical device manufacturers in recent times. The third edition of 60601-1 represents an overhaul of the 60601 group of medical electrical equipment safety standards. A commonly used standard, 60601-1 is an important tool for manufacturers when demonstrating compliance with the Essential Principles and Essential Requirements.  Standards selection and compliance is an important component of device development, manufacture and testing. Some changes debated and included in the third edition of 60601-1 are as follows: The scope of 60601-1 has been expanded......

Continue Reading


What is the ACMD and why should I be interested?

The ACMD stands for the Advisory Committee on Medical Devices, a committee which provides independent medical and scientific advice to the Minister and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) on safety, quality and performance of medical devices supplied in Australia including issues relating to premarket conformity assessment and post market monitoring. The Committee is established under Regulation 38 of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 and the members are appointed by the Minister for Health and Ageing. ACMD review applies to most Class III medical device conformity assessment applications and their advice can have......

Continue Reading


Premarket Evaluation of High Risk Medical Devices in the EU

Recently the EU has come under heavy scrutiny for failing to produce adequate premarket clinical evidence that demonstrates efficacy and safety of innovative, higher – risk medical devices. Medtech experts from around Europe have collaborated to produce a report in which they argue that it is time to introduce randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in the EU for high risk medical devices (these are defined as innovative Class III medical devices and innovative implantable medical devices).The authors also propose centralising the evaluation process of these products....

Continue Reading


Some IVDs and Radiology devices to be exempt from FDA 510(k)

The FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) has announced plans to ease the pre-market notification, or 510(k), requirements for certain in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) and radiology devices with well established safety and effectiveness profiles. In a draft guidance document, the agency has listed 30 different device types that it intends to exempt from 510(k) notification requirements through the appropriate regulatory processes. Stakeholders had until October 2011 to submit feedback on the guidance, which includes devices for which FDA believes that a less stringent oversight would not compromise public health and safety. These include......

Continue Reading


EU publish much awaited draft regulation for e-labelling of medical devices

The European Commission has finally issued it’s much awaited draft regulation on e-labelling, the final version of which is expected to be adopted by 14 December and come into force during 2012. The proposed regulation sets out conditions under which instructions for use in paper format may be replaced by electronic versions with respect to medical devices that are intended for exclusive use by professionals users and for which use by other persons is not reasonably foreseen. While acknowledging the benefits of e-labelling, the commission states that the possibility of providing instructions......

Continue Reading